Saturday 21 May 2011

3 0 Honeycomb

3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • duncan989
    Sep 26, 12:07 PM
    Why Cingular?
    They do not alow you to unlock their phones - even after their contract has expired. They think there is usa and nothing else. If you travel - you are screwed - roam on our network (or go to hell)! They are useless for anyone who travels beyond canada or hawaii(ok - thats only 15% of americans)

    T-mobile are far and away the best carrier in the US. They dont have the most up to date phones - but they let you un lock after 90 days - and if you speak nicely to them ,(I told em I was going on business trip to Brazil) they do it earlier.

    I asked a cingular rep if they had the unlock code for my cell. She said "No, but we have Blue-TEETH" I kid you not. They are as bad as At&T. They are only interested in screwing the customer!

    If Apple go CIngular - I wont buy one - if they open it up to tmobile, I will.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • Manic Mouse
    Sep 10, 06:46 AM
    Powerbook G5 tomorrow!!! LOL ok, ok.. before someone shoots me .....

    I would really like a mid range mac, and kentsfield would be ideal! Everyone is worried about such a machine taking away sales from either the Mac Pro or the imac, but I still say apple should just be smart enough and feature it so that people either have to to imac, mac extreme or mac pro. 2 pci express slots, single optical drive, smaller amount of total memory, instead of having people have to go for the mac pro why cant apple make the mac pro the real high end workstation and have something smaller be a the mainstream workstation?

    The margins on a mid-mac should be better than the iMac since it's using standard (and therefore cheap) desktop components. So any mid-mac sales in preference to the iMac would probably make Apple more money anyway.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • asdf542
    Apr 14, 12:35 PM
    First, no I made no such claim. I responded to one. And the claim wasn't that it will be restricted to being Mac only, but that it will end up being Mac only, in the same sense that FW is. Some PC ship with FW, but not many. It is considered a Mac only interface. The gist is that TB may as well, if history repeats. You didn't prove anything. You see many PC's shipping with TB right now? How many PC vendors have announces support for TB? The unfortunate fact is that consumers know the USB brand, so the vendors will support it. TB might be in Intel's spec, but that doesn't mean every system will support it nor that many drive vendors will either. No. The claim simply stated 'Mac only'. Nothing more and nothing less and you agreed with said two word claim. Thunderbolt will be integrated into every Ivy Bridge chipset just like USB 3.0. It's not the same situation as FireWire in the slightest. Not only is it faster than USB 3.0 but it also works with USB via adapters as well as almost any other IO on the planet. FireWire worked only with FireWire devices.


    See econgeek's post. It explains is pretty well.

    You mean the one right above your post that proves you wrong? Funny stuff.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • EagerDragon
    Sep 14, 07:52 PM
    If you'd followed the dSLR world at all over the past two years, you wouldn't ask this question. :) Canon and Nikon are doing well; most everyone else is dropping like flies. Sony is trying to pick up the pieces that were Konica-Minolta's dSLR business, but at best they're going to be a distant third behind the Big Two. Pentax and Olympus are holding on as far as I know, but they are not doing well.

    It would be a very poor move for Apple, and I have no doubt they realize this. You might think Apple has a rabid fan base to draw on - go read any "Nikon vs. Canon" thread on any photo discussion board sometime to see REAL rabidity. :D
    I can see why they are not doing that well...... A film SLR is a heck of a lot cheaper and they were harder to make. They are charging way too much. Back in the old times we all had film SLR's for the quality, ability to change lens (not that different from todays lenses), etc. Unless you are a pro the prices are way out of most people budget. You spend 700 to 4000 for a body and every lens is 500. Crazy.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • Ugg
    Sep 19, 06:30 PM
    I think the big problem with rentals is that Netflix has it wrapped up right now. You can get a ton of movies for a monthly fee, and I don't see any way an online service can compete with that, at least not without losing money on it.

    If you know your best effort won't compare well to Netflix, does it really make sense to try and do it anyway? Or is it smarter just to stay out of such a cutthroat marketplace?


    Netflix is great, but it's not ideal. They offer too few foreign movies. The wait times for new releases can be phenomenal and some movies that they should be stocking, they aren't.

    The only real future for online movies is by renting them. I'd pay up to $3 per rental but have no desire to keep a movie. If I want to watch it again, I'll rent it again.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • Rocketman
    Sep 1, 02:55 PM
    While it sounds good, I don't see this happen soon at all. Also, Verizon disagrees with you, because they are pulling fiber to the homes in several (large) cities and more to come. The investment for 4G (802.16e I assume you're talking about)will be much too high while not providing enough guarantees it will be financial feasible in short and mid term to make shareholders feel confortable. But if it will, Apple will get my money :) But are there enough gadget geeks like me in the world? That will make or break the project.....


    It boils down to suburban, rural, and rural-suburban access.

    Currently Satellite will do it at high cost. (hughesnet.com)

    2G will do it with crippled bandwidth and high cost.

    POTS will do it with crippled speed and uncrippled cost.

    Big cities are never the biggest nut to crack.

    Rocketman





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • Cinch
    Sep 5, 12:56 PM
    attempts to unify the TV and the computer have been done for the last 15 years or so without success. I give Apple a less then 10% success. Even if they succeed, the definition of success here is greatly compromise to a point of failure.

    Cinch





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • jeremyb66
    Apr 4, 12:01 PM
    This is what you get when you (criminals) don't want to be part of society!! Take note criminals there will be REAL! repercussions for your actions.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • G4DP
    Mar 22, 04:11 PM
    2012... 18 month update cycle? Far, far too long. No way... If that's the case, for the first time in 27 years, Apple doesn't get my money.

    Have you paid any attention to the upgrade cycle since the switch to Intel for the Pro Towers?





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • Full of Win
    Mar 22, 08:26 PM
    Still rockin' the 2008 24" Core2 Duo 3.06 Ghz iMac. Best Mac I've ever owned. Next Mac will be whatever the largest screen they make and fastest chip they have whenever this one dies. 100% sold on the iMac.

    I'm still rockin on a 20 inch late 06 iMac. It's been relegated to email checker and emergency C4D node...the thing will not die.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • EagerDragon
    Sep 4, 06:59 PM
    I think it is the highly anticipated iToilet with universal iPod dock and count 'em four AppleTalk ports.

    Sorry the iToiletPaperDispenser is already out.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • flopticalcube
    Apr 19, 10:08 PM
    Keep listening to corporate run media which lies and doesn't tell the whole story.. my friend, unemployment and the economy aren't getting any better.. in fact, very soon it will collapse.. as inflation starts to settle in.. and if you wanna know the truth, look at BBC and other non-corporate run media for the truth. I know in my home state its like 7.9 percent and most of the jobs are health care and IT - no industrial, no customer service, nothing else.

    See the roll eyes after his post, I think he was being sarcastic.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • G4DP
    Mar 22, 01:30 PM
    Glad all the consumers machines get this first. All the kinks can be worked out before the MacPro gets it at the end of the year.

    LaCie have started making drives etc with Cripplepeak connectivity. There are a few others.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • aristotle
    Nov 13, 05:19 PM
    You say that but it's not necessarily true. One of my apps was rejected for depicting an image of an Apple product. Not a copyrighted file, mind you. Just a little icon, drawn by me, that looked like an Apple product. It was rejected for depicting an Apple trademark.
    Well that might a the case in your situation but it this case Rogue Amoeba is using Apple's own copyright images in a client server application where the API on OS X does not confer the right to use those images on other devices by third party developers.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • AidenShaw
    Sep 9, 10:19 AM
    Unless Leopard is designed to make full use of the extra threads/cores available on the quad-core Mac Pro.
    The real problem isn't the OS as much as it is in applications.

    A well-threaded O/S won't help make Photoshop or Avid run much faster, unless the application code is also able to use all of the cores that are present.

    Some applications are inherently serial - you have to do step A, then step B (because step B depends on step A). It's not a matter of poor programming, it's that the task is serial. (Note that many Photoshop benchmarks quote "MP-aware" filters separately from actions that don't scale.)

    For these "not well-threaded" applications, multiple cores will still be beneficial so that you can run multiple applications simultaneously - all at full speed.

    There are some server-type applications (web or database) that run many (hundreds or thousands) threads simultaneously. (For a web server - each browser session is a natural thread.) For these applications, operating system efficiency is important. The reports that OSX is poor at threading (such as Mac OS X limits server performance (http://www.macnn.com/articles/05/06/15/os.x.server.review/)) aren't really that important for desktop apps that want to use all 4 cores (or soon 8).


    http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2436
    The server performance of the Apple platform is, however, catastrophic.
    ...
    Workstation apps will hardly mind, but the performance of server applications depends greatly on the threading, signalling and locking engine.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • milo
    Mar 30, 01:00 PM
    Apple is upset at Amazon for using AppStore.
    Microsoft is upset at Apple for using App Store.

    What's your point? Are you trying to phrase it in a way that sounds like the two are somehow the same? Apple was awarded the trademark to "app store" and other companies want to use it - whether that trademark holds up we'll have to see.

    Go to about 1:03

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ko4V3G4NqII

    And what does that have to do with the app store trademark? He doesn't mention "app store" does he?


    However what isn't appreciated is that 'App' is in itself an abbreviation. It's debatable whether apple popularised it not but thats not the point.

    Good point. The obvious alternative to App Store is Application Store.

    Along those same lines, the term ANDROID was in general use and considered generic and not trademarkable. In Star Wars, George Lucas used the term Droid - since it hadn't been used before he was able to trademark the shorter term (which he still holds).


    News Flash 2013 Apple trademarks:

    Clothing Store, Shoe Store, Hardware Store, Candy Store and Mayonnaise

    What about the Container Store, which is trademarked? Seems like the difference is whether or not the term is in common use before the trademark is filed.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • M-O
    May 3, 10:16 AM
    what about target display mode on the 21/24" models?





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • DrFrankTM
    Sep 10, 05:19 AM
    If my memory serves me correctly Conroe will not be pin compatible with Merom, is that right? I just can't remember what's what anymore. Old age.

    As far as I know, the first generation Merom is pin-compatible with Yonah, the Core Duo mobile processor that is in the MacBook, MacBook Pro and Mac Mini at the moment. And if I'm not mistaken, Kentsfield will be pin-compatible with Conroe, which is not used in any Mac at the moment.

    EDIT: But no, Conroe and Merom are not pin-compatible.





    3 0 Honeycomb. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • calculus
    Oct 12, 02:54 PM
    Here's a challenge. How about everyone here who has an iPod gives $10 or equivalent to this charity?





    sjo
    Sep 26, 02:28 PM
    Yeah, I am in the same boat.
    For me Cingular is the worst because I can't get it to work at my home and work. I have Verizon, is OK. but at least work. The truth is every carrier has a problem. I am still waiting to find somebody that says their carrier is 100% great and they are satisfied.
    I hope iphone will work on other carriers. If not I'll wait until it comes with Verizon or any other carrier other than Cingular.
    What good is to have an amazing phone if you can talk or get coverage?

    Hey I'm satisfied with my carrier. I think the last time I had any problems with coverage was back in the 20th century. I've got coverage even in the freaking underground. I'd have coverage in the middle of wilderness if I chose to go there. It's cheap as well, I never pay incoming calls, my phone has never been locked and it works pretty much all over the world, my operator has had packet data connection most of this century as well and 3g for several years. What more could I wish?





    IJ Reilly
    Aug 23, 04:40 PM
    $100 million? Yikes. :eek:





    Goldfinger
    Sep 26, 01:35 PM
    Please, please, please, do not switch to Cingular just for this phone! They are known for having the worst customer service in the USA. It was a nightmare being with them (5 calls a month to Cingular customer service, at ~45 minutes each, to correct their billing mistakes). I switched to T-Mobile, and they are FAR better. Their customer service is a excellent.
    I find it incredible that they even make mistakes on their bills. These days with completely automated ERP software those mistakes should be virtually inexistant.





    plinkoman
    Sep 13, 09:18 PM
    wow, looks nice. But i have an iPod, and a razr; so I really have no need for this.

    and yes, it does look like that lg thing, but thats only because lg made a pathetic attempt at copying the clickwheel. :rolleyes:





    manu chao
    Apr 20, 10:10 AM
    Do the system logs of your Mac contain all the WiFi networks you have ever connected to? And can't you track a laptop's movement from this?

    Logging takes place all the time, the question is always how long the logs are kept, system.log gets deleted after some time, it seems the oldest are eight days old on my Mac. Now, why would the iPhone not delete these log files after a while?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    LinkWithin

    f