Sunday 22 May 2011

hairstyles for fat faces

hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • p0intblank
    Jan 5, 04:20 PM
    I did this for WWDC and enjoyed it more than reading the updates. I'll be doing it again for Macworld. It's just so much more exciting. :D





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • mechamac
    Sep 12, 07:28 AM
    Didn't Lion's Gate mention the movie store in some recent internal conference? I doubt we'll be seeing just the iTunes Disney & Pixar Movie Store today. Fewer studios than we might like, but I can't imagine they'd launch without, y'know, a couple movies for grownups.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • Konz
    Oct 6, 02:33 PM
    Looks more deceptive than factual. I'm sure Verizon is being very generous with the definition of "3G coverage" for their own network while doing just the opposite with AT&T's.

    Neither carrier actually has a 3G coverage map available on their website.

    A little fishy? Me thinks.... :confused:





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • vassillios
    Apr 15, 12:37 PM
    Obviously fake. Look at the slanted iPhone writing on the bottom photo. Horrible photoshop skills





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • OdduWon
    Oct 11, 05:07 AM
    a nice iPod Video with NEF/RAW reading capability for us photographers, I'm a waiting customer. And yes, a smaller MacBook with 10 hour battery life, non-reflective screen and a graphics card to use it with Aperture/RAW would be sooo nice... :)
    the macpod pro could be a notepad device that has the ability to interface with ext hard drives adn icoul be like a wireless ouch screen 3/4 in thin





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • geoffism
    Jan 9, 11:55 AM
    i expect a new iphone(yes i do).the current iphone i think sucks i rather buy a nokia/sony ericson....

    really? do you have one or is this from a distance opinion? Asking, because I am on the verge...





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • ITR 81
    Oct 17, 12:18 PM
    so it's kind of a mixture here.
    1. more capacity -> blu-ray
    2. lower price -> hd-dvd
    3. porn industry choses the cheapest format -> hd-dvd

    the big thing will be the players. blu-ray players had a bad start (frames were dropped, image quality wasn't that good, delays).

    it looks like blu-ray will have a hard fight.


    HD DVD is barely any cheaper then Blu-Ray right now.
    I mean few bucks isn't going to change my mind.

    Also the porn industry more then likely went with VHS because of it's 3 hrs capacity then it just being cheaper of the two. Think how much porn could be crammed onto a blu-ray disc!?





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • theITGuy
    Nov 29, 10:12 AM
    Anyone playing the Barebones playlists? I love 'em...

    -J.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • wingnut8
    Apr 25, 02:35 PM
    Wirelessly posted (iPhone 3GS: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)

    4S would be dumb. Every phone from here on out is going to be faster. No need for the "speed" added on the the end.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • DoFoT9
    Sep 19, 05:47 PM
    my power bill (which includes water and sewer) was $385 last month!

    but i did finally get someone out to look at the a/c unit. i believe that is a big part of the problem. we'll see
    we looked into it, our a/cs chew 30w each WHEN THEY ARE TURNED OFF! its insane. we now turn them off at the power box.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • inkswamp
    Mar 24, 09:09 PM
    I remember the first time I played around with OS X. It was on one of those colored iBooks at the only store in my town that carried Macs back then. I really hated it. It seemed so pointless at the time. I remember the toolbar buttons were gigantic (remember the big square buttons with the home and heart icons on them?) It was actually sort of depressing thinking that was the future of the Mac. I still didn't find it tolerable until Jaguar 10.2 but even then, there were so many little annoyances with it compared to OS 9. Now, I couldn't ever dream of going back to the Classic Mac OS.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • MagnusVonMagnum
    Apr 30, 07:38 AM
    Nope, it won't happen at all. There is too big of a market for people who write and rely on custom software.


    Who said there couldn't be custom software? You'll simply need a developer package. Students might get a special 'exception' area on the App store or private access or whatever, but it doesn't mean they won't start closing down the system at some point. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon....






    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • Arcady
    Sep 12, 01:26 AM
    don't think we're just getting Mickey Mouse and Daffy Duck movies

    Daffy Duck is from Warner, not Disney.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • dayloon
    Apr 9, 05:28 PM
    A lot of the 'rumours' you posted are nonsense. Windows 8 will not and will never be unix based





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • Sdevante
    Mar 17, 10:08 AM
    I call shenanigans.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • ten-oak-druid
    May 2, 05:08 PM
    You obviously missed the irony of it all (and yes, OSX is around 10 years old now). Windows was never called "1, 2, 3" etc. so there's more irony for OSX which did takes 10 years to get where it is now (i.e that's how long they've been working on OSX; OS9 has NOTHING to do with the length of time they've spent on the current OS, which has little or nothing to do with OS9 technologically other than the similarity in GUI interface (save the overlap in Carbon libraries). OSX is based on NeXTStep, itself based on Unix. It's not based on Mac Classic OS 1-9. But then my ;) should have clued you in. But then Windows haters rarely get such humor, IMO.

    You're implying that I said something that you are "correcting" me on. Length of time of OS X development? Show me where I mentioned this before proceeding to "correct me". :rolleyes:

    The thing I mentioned was the progression of names: OS 9 then OS X. I know the two are vastly different. I know OS X is based on unix. But to say the numbering doesn't show a progression is silly. OS X instead of OS 10 indicates a significant change while preserving the numbering.

    I was only discussing the name Windows 7. Everyone with an answer believes they know. I don't know so I will not critique the individual answers. But I find it fascinating that between obvious Windows users there is no consensus. I've seen more than one explanation for the "7".

    And finally I am not a Windows "hater". I am a hater of people who care to waste my time telling me why using a Mac is "wrong". I will say that since being away from Windows for the most part for some time now, that I am lost on that OS. It used to be that I could go back and forth with ease. But the subtle changes to Windows have made it less intuitive IMO. And being a non-Windows user I think I am a good judge of whether it is intuitive or not when I try it. Microsoft has been making changes to Office for Mac over the years that I find strange. Labeling axis on a graph in excel for instance is less intuitive than it used to be. But recently I had to use excel on a Windows machine and I have to say it was very strange how it has been organized. The changes to Office for Mac OS are nothing compared to the changes I have seen to Office for Windows OS.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • tvachon
    Jan 9, 02:01 PM
    Well I know that the keynote is encoded and uploaded with 90% certianity by now, but they use Akamai for distrubuted large files. It takes a file about 45 minutes to populate across Akamai's servers globally. Apple won't post the link until that is done.





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • gorgeousninja
    Apr 17, 06:28 AM
    I just want to sync my music. **** itunes **** what ever. I love bit torrent. I refuse to pay for music or movies.

    so you're a common dirty thief who steals from people..and proud of the fact? Under Sharia law they'd chop your hands off....





    hairstyles for fat faces. %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • WestonHarvey1
    Jul 21, 12:40 PM
    But Apple admitted that it DOES drop more calls than 3GS.

    They spun it as "less than 1 per 100", but assuming all 3,000,000 iPhone 4 users make about 5 calls per day, that's over ONE MILLION dropped calls per week MORE than iPhone 3GS.[/I]

    That total number is meaningless to the end user. The Average user will make 100 calls on a 4 and 100 on a 3GS and not see a difference.

    It's also a number that could change from week to week depending on all sorts of nebulous factors. This week the stats might favor the 4 by 1 call for all you know.





    AndroidfoLife
    Apr 15, 10:28 PM
    Google, Microsoft and Bush are Devils!

    For the most part they all work together. Apple Google and Microsoft are all the devils they all work together to form a greater overarching monopoly. It all cost so much because they want it so.





    SPEEDwithJJ
    Mar 17, 12:51 AM
    Nice. Too bad some kid is going to have $300 docked from his pay...

    Unfortunately, that's also true. :(





    *LTD*
    Apr 22, 07:00 PM
    Google at least only stores the last 50 cell towers and 200 wifi compared to Apple which keeps all of it locally.

    What exactly (specifically) is your worry?





    Deefuzz
    Aug 7, 03:40 PM
    Price drops are always a good thing ;)





    wnurse
    Aug 8, 08:32 AM
    Be careful! wnurse may not have gotten a nap, and can get very cranky when people point out differences between Dell and Apple monitors. ;)

    Seriously though, wnurse, lighten up and chill out! :cool:

    Actually stoid, i really don't care about Dell monitors or Apple's for that matter. It's not a religious matter to me. I'm apple worst nightmare. A customer that is not passionate about their products. I would drop apple in a minute if something better comes along or something just as good with a cheaper price (hence the dell monitor). I just hate to read people making comments like "if you think apple monitors are expensive, enjoy your sucky dell monitor". It's annonying and childish. You have no idea on the quality of Dell or anyone else monitor. That was not the bad part.. that's ok, not everyone knows everything.. then when someone points out something to you, you attack without any facts. Maybe I was rough with you but I think my initial post was gentle.. I only got rough when you when into auto robot apple fanboy mode.
    Apple fans are supposed to be different, think different. I thought that meant using our brains and being smarter than the average mindless pc sheep. To me, apple fans are mindless sheep just like the PC users, except they like apple products. I'm a user of apple products and unless windows dramatically improves, i intend to continue buying apple computers but it doesn't blind me to specific faults of the system. Just as I appreciate Apple strengths, I am aware of their weaknesses. Saying an Apple monitor is affordable is disingenius. This attitude is what has allowed apple to basically steal our money because they know the apple fanbase will not protest. I don't mind paying a premium for apple computers (actually, i did pay a hefty premium for my G5 computer) but paying a premium for a monitor?.. what?.. apple monitors crash less than Dells? (tongue in cheek here.. i know monitors don't crash). Maybe Apple monitors do not contract viruses as often as Dells (haha, funny). I mean, other than a nice case and the apple logo, exactly what am i paying for here?. I guess I would stop bitching if Apple made a 30 inch for graphic professionals and a 30 inch for the rest of us (although i doubt the Dell panels cost less than the apple panels so that might not be a price break anyway). It breaks my heart really that i had to resort to getting a Dell monitor (actually, at the time, Dell 20 inches were $609, apple 20 inch was over $1200). I couldn't imagine paying twice for basically the same thing but with an apple logo and a nice case.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    LinkWithin

    f